|
December 25, 1996 NY Times
White House Rejects Federal
Aid for Black
English Courses
By JAMES BENNET
WASHINGTON -- Joining a rising
chorus of criticism, the Clinton
administration Tuesday formally
rejected the idea that black
English, or Ebonics is a
distinct language, saying that programs based on it
were ineligible for federal
support as bilingual education.
The administration issued
its view, in the form of a clarification by the
Department of Education,
in response to a decision last week by the school
board in Oakland, Calif.,
to recognize black English as a separate language
with roots in Africa.
"Elevating black English
to the status of a language is not the way to raise
standards of achievement
in our schools and for our students," Education
Secretary Richard Riley
said in a statement. "The administration's policy is
that Ebonics is a nonstandard
form of English and not a foreign language."
Tuesday's move amounted to
a pre-emptive strike by the administration.
While Oakland officials
had left open the possibility of seeking federal
money for bilingual education,
they have not done so. And Tuesday,
Darolyn Davis, a spokeswoman
for the Oakland Unified School District,
denied that they ever intended
to.
"The school district has
never, and did not intend to, go after federal funds,
bilingual funding," Ms.
Davis said.
She added that the district's
intentions had been widely misinterpreted. "The
goal and the intent of the
district's policy are to insure that every child in
Oakland speaks, writes and
comprehends standard American English," she
said. "It would be a crime,
it really would be a crime, to not teach students
standard American English."
The decision by the Oakland
board has been widely criticized, with
liberals like the Rev. Jesse
Jackson lining up with conservatives like
William Bennett to deplore
it as lowering expectations for black children.
On Sunday, Jackson called
the decision "an unacceptable surrender,
borderlining on disgrace."
The National Association for the Advancement
of Colored People has also
opposed classifying black English as a language
apart.
The White House did not hesitate
to reinforce Riley's message Tuesday.
"It's a big mistake," Rahm
Emanuel, an adviser to President Clinton on
domestic policy, said of
the Oakland decision. "Just when the debate
around the country is how
do we raise standards, this is going the other
way."
David Frank, a department
spokesman, said that public speculation about
whether Ebonics programs
might qualify for federal financing had prompted
the clarification. "There's
been a lot of interest in the press about it, a lot of
stories in the last week,"
Frank said.
In 1981, Ronald Reagan's
Department of Education issued the same ruling,
calling black English "a
form of English and not a separate and distinct
language." It was not immediately
clear how easily the department could
have reversed that view,
had it chosen to.
As the Reagan ruling suggests,
academics and teachers have for decades
debated whether black English
should be recognized as its own tongue, a
question charged with issues
of race and class.
In Oakland, administrators
hoped that by recognizing the speech patterns of
students speaking black
English, teachers could better instruct them in
standard English, said Ms.
Davis, the spokeswoman. While details of the
black English program remain
to be worked out, teachers might receive
merit pay for studying black
English and using their new expertise in their
lessons.
While some specialists fear
that classifying black English as a separate
language could stigmatize
children who speak it, others argue that too little
has been done to counter
the linguistic legacies of slavery, segregation and
the inner city.
Under the fiscal 1997 budget,
children who speak foreign languages are
eligible for $262 million
in Department of Education money for bilingual
education. While the overwhelming
majority who qualify speak Spanish,
more than 100 languages
are represented in the federal programs, said
Delia Pompa, the director
of the office of Bilingual Education and Minority
Languages Affairs.
Ms. Pompa said that federal
grants could be used to train teachers, to hire
teachers' aides who speak
the foreign language, for developing a
curriculum, or other purposes. |