Chromosome studies of children with specific speech and language delay.
Mutton DE, Lea J
Dev Med Child Neurol 1980 Oct 22:5 588-94
Abstract
Among 88 children with speech and language problems from whom chromosome
results were obtained, four were identified with a chromosome anomaly.
Three had sex chromosome aneuploidy and had developmental problems, particularly
with articulation. The fourth child had low-grade trisomy 21 in blood,
with minimal signs of Down's syndrome but with bilateral conductive hearing
loss. It is suggested that delay in speech development is one facet of
the developmental problems that may be significant in later behavioural
problems in adolescent and adult males with X and Y aneuploidy.
Abstract
Forty-one children with sex chromosome anomalies identified from the
chromosome screening of a newborn population were blindly evaluated by
a speech-language pathologist, along with a control group of 31 siblings.
47,XXX girls and 47,XXY boys were found to have increased problems in auditory
perception, receptive language, and expressive language; the problems of
the 47,XXY boys were less severe than those of the 47,XXX group, and reflected
specific deficits in their ability to process linguistic information rather
than a deficit in comprehension. An increased occurrence of speech production
problems among the 45,X girls was associated with the presence of oral/structural
malformations that often had no measurable effect on their production of
speech sounds. Although the 45,X girls and 47,XYY boys had no significant
increase of problems in auditory reception, receptive language, and expressive
language, the trend of the data suggested more difficulty than in the control
groups. The mosaic children were not different from the control subjects.
Some children in all groups were found to have normal speech and language
development.
_____________________________________
Unexpected sex-ratios in families of language/learning-impaired children.
Tallal P, Ross R, Curtiss S
Neuropsychologia 1989 27:7 987-98
Abstract
There is a well-documented propensity of males affected with developmental
language/learning impairment. Results from this study demonstrate, unexpectedly,
that this sex-ratio difference of males to females with developmental language/learning
disorders was found to occur significantly only in families with a language/learning-impaired
mother. In addition, a remarkably aberrant offspring sex-ratio was found
in families of language/learning-impaired children who had an affected
mother, but not father. Mothers who were developmentally language/learning-impaired
had three times as many sons as daughters, and five times as many language/learning-impaired
sons as daughters. Genetic and hormonal influences that might affect both
sex-ratio and neuroanatomical development and disorders are discussed.
____________________________________________
Praxic and nonverbal cognitive deficits in a large family with a genetically
transmitted speech and language disorder.
Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins K, Alcock K, Fletcher P, Passingham R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995 Jan 31 92:3 930-3
Abstract
A pronounced speech and language disorder affecting half of the 30
members of the four-generational KE family has been attributed by some
researchers to a specific defect in the generation of morphosyntactic rules.
The reported selectivity of the impairment has led to the view that the
affected members suffer from a grammar-specific disorder. Our investigations
of the same KE family indicate that the inherited disorder has a broad
phenotype which transcends impaired generation of syntactical rules and
includes a striking articulatory impairment as well as defects in intellectual,
linguistic, and orofacial praxic functions generally. Although the evidence
from this family thus provides no support for the existence of ''grammar
genes,'' their linguistic difficulties do constitute a prominent part of
their phenotype. Investigations of the neural and genetic correlates of
their disorder could therefore uncover important clues to some of the bases
of the primary human faculties of speech and language.
___________________________________
A grammatical specific language impairment in children: an autosomal
dominant inheritance?
van der Lely HK, Stollwerck L
Brain Lang 1996 Mar 52:3 484-504
Abstract
The aim of this study is to provide further characterization of a subgroup
of so-called ''Grammatical specific language-impaired (SLI)'' children.
The Grammatical SLI children have a persistent and disproportionate impairment
in grammatical comprehension and expression of language. Previous research
has indicated that their language impairment may be characterized by a
domain-specific and modular language deficit. This study provides an initial
investigation as to whether there is a genetic basis underlying their disorder
as has been found for other forms of SLI and for SLI in general. The incidence
of familial aggregation of language impairment was investigated in 12 Grammatical
SLI children (aged 9:3 to 12:10). A familial language impairment (LI) history
was classified as positive if one or more of the probands' relatives had
a history of a speech/language or reading/writing problem which required
speech therapy or any other form of remedial help. Case history information
provided an initial indication that the Grammatical SLI children had a
significantly higher incidence of a positive familial LI history than could
be expected by chance. A questionnaire provided evidence of a positive
LI history in the first-degree relatives of the SLI probands and 49 normally
developing control probands. The SLI probands had a clearly and significantly
higher incidence of a positive familial LI history than the control probands
(77.8 vs. 28.5%, respectively). The results are consistent with a genetic
basis underlying Grammatical SLI. The pattern of impairment in the SLI
probands' relatives is consistent with an autosomal dominant genetic inheritance.
In contrast to the control probands, the SLI probands' impaired relatives
did not show a male gender bias. Thus, the gene does not appear to be sex-linked.
The data indicate that further research is warranted to investigate the
nature of the LI in the relatives of the Grammatical SLI probands and the
genetic characteristics of this subgroup. The implications for the biological,
domain-specific, and modular bases to language are discussed
_________________________________________
Brain Lang 1983 May;19(1):115-23
Mirror writing in right-handers and in left-handers.
Tankle RS, Heilman KM
To determine whether normal left-handers were more adept than were normal
right-handers at mirror writing, we tested right-handers and left-handers
for their ability to mirror write. Independent of hand used, left-handers
wrote mirror words (but not normal words) faster than did right-handers,
which suggest that left-handers may be better able to reverse directions
(left leads to right to right leads to left). Although when using their
preferred hand, left-handers made fewer errors than did right-handers (using
their preferred hand), the left hand both in right- and in left-handers
was superior to the right hand. That the left hand was superior to the
right is compatible with the hypothesis either that the right hemisphere
contains mirror engrams or that movements away from the body are more accurate
than movements toward the body or both.
_____________________________
Brain Lang 1998 Sep;64(2):182-214
Do the hands talk on mind's behalf? Differences in language ability between left- and right-handed children.
Natsopoulos D, Kiosseoglou G, Xeromeritou A, Alevriadou A
University of Thessaloniki, Hellas, Greece.
Two hundred seventy children of school age, 135 of whom were left-handed
and an
equivalent number of whom were right-handed, have been examined in
the present study using a test battery of nine language ability measures:
Vocabulary, Similarities, Comprehension (WISC-R), Deductive Reasoning,
Inductive Reasoning, Sentence Completion, Comprehension of Sentential Semantics,
Comprehension of Syntax, and Text Processing. The data analysis has indicated
that: (1) One-factor solution applies both to the right- and left-handed
population according to Standard Error Scree Method (Zoski & Jurs,
1996) with regard to language ability measures. (2) Handedness discriminates
between right-handers (superior) and left-handers (inferior) in language
ability. (3) There have been subgroups of left-handed children who differ
in language ability distribution compared with right-handed children according
to Hierarchical Cluster Analysis. (4) Extreme versus mild bias to hand
preference and hand skill do not differentiate performance subgroups
neither within the left-handed nor within the right-handed main group.
(5) Sex and familial sinistrality do not affect performance. The results
are discussed in relation to (a) "human balanced polymorphism" theory advocated
by Annett (mainly Annett, 1985, 1993a; Annett & Manning, 1989), (b)
potential pathology (mainly Bishop, 1984, 1990a; Coren & Halpern, 1991;
Satz, Orsini, Saslow & Henry, 1985) and "developmental instability"
(Yeo, Gangestad & Daniel, 1993), and delay of left-hemisphere maturation
in left-handed individuals (Geschwind & Galaburda, 1985a,b, 1987),
by pointing out the strength and weaknesses of these theoretical approaches
in accounting for the present data. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
________________
Onset of speech after left hemispherectomy in a nine-year-old boy.
Vargha-Khadem F, Carr LJ, Isaacs E, Brett E, Adams C, Mishkin M
Brain 1997 Jan 120 ( Pt 1) 159-82
Abstract
Case Alex, with Sturge-Weber Syndrome affecting the left hemisphere,
failed
to develop speech throughout early boyhood, and his comprehension of
single words and simple commands remained stagnant at an age
equivalent of 3-4 years. But then, following left hemidecortication
at age
8.5 years and withdrawal of anticonvulsants when he was more than 9
years old, Alex suddenly began to acquire speech and language. He also
showed an unusual degree of residual motor capacity on his right side.
Alex's remarkable progress in learning speech and language, and the development
of his other cognitive abilities, were measured periodically from the age
of 9 to 15 years. His most recent scores on tests of receptive and expressive
language place him at an age equivalent of 8-10 years. Comparison with
the
level of function attained in these domains by nine other left hemispherectomized
patients with early onset of disease and comparable
IQ (range, 40-68) but with early development of speech and language,
suggests that, surprisingly, Alex has suffered no permanent disadvantage
from his protracted period of mutism and severely limited comprehension.
Although the findings in Alex, as in other left-hemispherectomized patients,
indicate define limits to the cognitive and linguistic capacity of the
isolated right hemisphere, Alex's achievements appear to challenge the
widely held view that early childhood is a particularly critical period
for acquisition of speech and language or any of their selective aspects,
including phonology,
grammar, prosody and semantics. It is concluded that clearly articulated,
well structured, and appropriate language can be acquired for the first
time as late as age 9 years with the right hemisphere alone.
Author Address
Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Institute of Child Health, UK.
______________________________________
Children's language disorders: recent research advances.
Ludlow CL
Ann Neurol 1980 Jun 7:6 497-507 [look at the date!]
Abstract
Between 3 and 8% of preschool children in Britain and the United States
are
delayed in their language development by more than a year below the
normal range. Evidence suggests that such children are particularly impaired
in acquiring syntactic and morphological rules, although well-defined syndromes
of impaired language development have not yet been determined. The effects
of preschool impairments in language development on subsequent school achievement
are significant: 60% of these children are in special classes for the learning
impaired at 9 years of age. Auditory
processing deficits have been demonstrated in language-impaired children,
but the contributions of such deficits to language development difficulties
have yet to be determined. While autistic children have severe
cognitive disorders and visual and auditory perceptual disturbances,
the difficulties of nonautistic language-impaired children seem confined
more to language expression and comprehension. Recent neuropsychological
evidence concerning brain organization for language behavior suggests
that these children have deficiencies in language functions which normally
depend on left hemisphere functioning.
______________________________
Communication development and its disorders: a psycholinguistic perspective.
Paul R, Cohen DJ
Schizophr Bull 1982 8:2 279-93
Abstract
There is a reciprocal relationship between the study of language disorders
and research in normal language development. Recent studies in normal
acquisition have led to a model of language development that
includes not only linguistic achievements, but the development of social
and
cognitive abilities that lay the basis for the transition from prelinguistic
communication to the use of conventional forms. This model has
been applied to the study of developmental disorders of language learning.
Such a model allows the more puzzling disorders of language development,
such as childhood aphasia and primary autism, to be placed in a framework
that predicts language disruption when underlying perceptual,
Relationship between imaginative play and language development in
hearing-impaired children.
Schirmer BR
Am Ann Deaf 1989 Jul 134:3 219-22
Abstract
The relationship between imaginative play and language development
was
investigated in a group of 20 severely and profoundly hearing-impaired
children between the ages of 3 and 6. Each child was videotaped
in a 60-minute session interacting with the investigator and playing
with
three sets of toys: a miniature house, barn, and garage. Analysis of
the subjects' language revealed that 15 were operating in Brown's (1973)
Stage 1, one in Stage 3, and four in Stage 5. Play was analyzed along three
dimensions: (a) percentage of time engaged in imaginative play; (b) use
of planned pretend; and (c) use of story line. A significant relationship
was found between imaginative play and language development. Results revealed
no relationship between imaginative play and chronological age. Correspondences
were found between language development and use of planned pretend and
story line.
Abstract
To what extent is the neural organization of language
dependent on factors specific to the modalities in which
language is perceived and through which it is produced?
That is, is the left-hemisphere dominance for language
a function of a linguistic specialization or a function of
some domain-general specialization(s), such as
temporal processing or motor planning? Investigations
of the neurobiology of signed language can help answer
these questions. As with spoken languages, signed
languages of the deaf display complex grammatical
structure but are perceived and produced via radically
different modalities. Thus, by mapping out the
neurological similarities and differences between signed
and spoken language, it is possible to identify
modality-specific contributions to brain organization for
language. Research to date has shown a significant
degree of similarity in the neurobiology of signed and
spoken languages, suggesting that the neural
organization of language is largely modality-independent.
__________________________
Language learning and retention in young language-disordered children.
Gaines R, Leaper C, Monahan C, Weickgenant A
J Autism Dev Disord 1988 Jun 18:2 281-96
Abstract
Simultaneous sign and spoken language training was conducted with young,
language-disordered children under standardized training and follow-up
conditions with a stringent learning criterion to determine if language
learned was stable over time. Twenty-one children between 36 and 86 months
with no or nonfunctional language participated in the study. Diagnoses
included
autism, mental retardation, combined autism and mental retardation,
and developmental aphasia. Children completed a mean of 74 signed speech
training sessions. Sessions were twice daily, 5 days a week. Follow-up
evaluations were made approximately 6 months after training. Of the
21 children, 17 learned at least one word and 7 children learned multiple-word
phrases during the training. Most language learned in training was found
to be retained at follow-up approximately 6 months later. Gestural imitation,
play style, language age, developmental age, and fine motor skills had
strong correlations with language learning and retention.
________________________________
Whole language and deaf bilingual-bicultural education--naturally!
Mason D, Ewoldt C
Am Ann Deaf 1996 Oct 141:4 293-8
Abstract
This position paper discusses how the tenets of Whole Language and
Deaf
Bilingual-Bicultural Education complement each other. It stresses that
Whole Language is based on natural processes through which children can
translate their constructs of personal experiences, observations, and perspectives
into modes of communication that include written language and, in the present
case, American Sign Language. The paper is based on two emphases: (a) Whole
Language emphasizes a two-way teaching/learning process, teachers learning
from children, and vice versa; and (b) Deaf Bilingual-Bicultural Education
emphasizes American Sign Language as a language of instruction and builds
on mutual respect for the similarities and differences in the sociocultural
and socioeducational experiences and values of Deaf and hearing people.
Both Whole Language and Deaf Bilingual-Bicultural Education attempt to
authenticate curriculum by integrating Deaf persons' worldviews as part
of educational experience.
____________________________
A comparison of sign and verbal language training with nonverbal retarded
children.
Kahn JV
J Speech Hear Res 1981 Mar 24:1 113-9
Abstract
Twelve nonverbal, hearing, retarded children were matched and then
randomly assigned to sign language training, speech training, and placebo
groups. Four of the subjects received speech training using the Bricker.
Dennison, and Bricker (1976) program, and four subjects received
sign language training using an adaptation of the Bricker et al. program.
The results indicated no statistically significant difference between the
verbal and sign language groups through the sign group and verbal group
did learn significantly more than the placebo group. A closer examination
of the findings indicated that although all four of the sign language subjects
learned some signs, only two of the four speech training subjects learned
to say words. The findings were interpreted as indicating that some nonverbal
retarded children will benefit [MORE?] from sign language than speech training.
Suggestions for the direction of future research are given.
______________________________
Dissociation between linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural systems:
a case
for
compositionality.
Corina DP, Poizner H, Bellugi U, Feinberg T, Dowd D, O'Grady-Batch
L
Brain Lang 1992 Oct 43:3 414-47
Abstract
This paper addresses the issue of the separability of disorders of
sign
language from disorders of gesture and pantomime. The study of a left-lesioned
deaf signer presents one of the most striking examples to date
of the cleavage between linguistic signs and manual pantomime. The
left-hemisphere lesion produced a marked sign language aphasia disrupting
both the production and the comprehension of sign language.
However, in sharp contrast to the breakdown of sign language, the ability
to communicate in nonlinguistic gesture was remarkably spared. This
case has important implications for our understanding of the neural mediation
of language and gesture. We argue that the differences observed in the
fractionation of linguistic versus nonlinguistic gesture reflect differing
degrees of compositionality of systems underlying language and gesture.
The compositionality hypothesis receives support for the existence of phonemic
paraphasias in sign language production, illustrating structural dissolution
which is absent in the production of pantomimic gesture. Understanding
the neural encoding of compositional motoric systems may lead to a principled
anatomical account of the neural separability of language and gesture.
Thiscase provides a powerful indication of the left hemisphere's specialization
for language-specific functions.