Brain May Grow New Cells Daily
By NICHOLAS WADE
In a new challenge to the
longstanding belief that adults never
generate new brain cells,
biologists at
Princeton University have
found that
thousands of freshly born
neurons arrive
each day in the cerebral
cortex, the outer
rind of the brain where
higher intellectual
functions and personality
are centered.
Though based on research
in monkeys, the
finding is likely to prove
true of people,
too.
If so, several experts said,
it may overturn
ideas about how the human
brain works
and open new possibilities
for treating
degenerative brain diseases.
If the new brain cells,
or neurons, are
involved in memory
and learning --
perhaps with each
day's batch of new
cells recording that
day's experiences --
scientists will have to
make major revisions
in the longtime view
that the adult brain's
neurons are static in
number and that
memory is stored
only in the way they
interconnect.
In addition, if the
brain's cells are in
constant turnover, as
the new finding
suggests, physicians
may discover ways to
use the brain's
natural regeneration
system for replacing
cells that are lost in
diseases of aging.
The discovery, by Elizabeth
Gould and
Charles G. Gross, is reported
in Friday's
issue of the journal Science.
The belief that the adult
brain does not
make new cells rested on
careful,
well-known studies by Pasko
Rakic of Yale
University, who looked for
the formation of
new neurons in the monkey
brain and
found none.
But the Princeton work is
likely to be
convincing, because it builds
on previous
reports of brain cell turnover,
notably by
Fernando Nottebohm of Rockefeller
University, who showed that
canaries grow
new neurons to learn new
songs, and
recent studies showing that
new cells are
formed in the hippocampus,
a brain region
where initial memories of
faces and places
are formed.
"The scientific community
can easily
believe something it is
50 percent ready to
absorb, but not something
that comes out
of left field," said Eric
R. Kandel, a leading
neuroscientist at Columbia
University. "But
here, we are prepared for
it."
Kandel compared the likely
change in view
to the paradigm shifts described
by the
historian of science Thomas
Kuhn as
occurring when one major
scientific theory
is replaced by another.
Although the new study was
done in
macaque monkeys and has
yet to be
confirmed in humans, as
fellow primates
monkeys are usually quite
predictive of
what occurs in people.
Gould, who has studied new
cell formation
in the hippocampus, and
Gross, an expert
on the cerebral cortex,
injected macaques
with a chemical that is
incorporated in the
new DNA formed when a cell
divides.
They found that a stream
of new neurons
were generated in the monkeys'
brains in a
zone just above the brain's
fluid-filled
central chambers. This zone
was recently
identified by other scientists
as the home
of the brain's stem cells,
the source cells
from which an organ is replenished.
The new neurons migrated
toward the
cortex, matured and sent
out axons to
make connections with other
brain cells,
the Princeton biologists
found.
The researchers looked for
new neurons in
four areas of the cortex,
and found them in
three areas where memories
are known to
be stored: the frontal cortex,
used for
decision-making, and two
areas on the side
of the brain used for visual
recognition.
No new neurons were detected
in the
fourth area, the striate
cortex, a region at
the back of the head that
simply processes
visual information from
the eyes and
passes it on to other parts
of the cortex.
Whatever the new cells are
doing in the
cortex, they affect regions
of the brain that
are central to human thought
and identity.
The Princeton work, said
Ronald D. G.
McKay, an expert on brain
stem cells at
the National Institutes
of Health, "places
new neurons in the region
of the brain
involved in the highest
level of
personality: it's the frontal
cortex that is
important in determining
who you are in a
very human way."
Gould said it was possible
that the new
neurons arriving in the
cortex would be
particularly sensitive to
recording
information for a certain
period while they
matured.
"They would become integrated
in the
circuitry and represent
the information
being learned at that particular
time," she
said, after which they would
not record
anything more.
In other words, the conveyor
belt of new
neurons might record successive
days'
experiences almost like
a moving tape.
"We know the characteristic
of memory is
that events are tagged with
times," Gross
said. "We have no idea how
that is done.
But since we have now shown
there are
new cells added every day,
which cover a
spectrum of ages, these
cells could possibly
provide the substrate for
the temporal
dimension of memory."
Kandel, of Columbia University,
said the
idea was perfectly possible,
given how little
was now known about the
brain's system
for ultimate long-term memory
storage.
"How do you distinguish the
memory of 20
years ago from the memory
of 30 years
ago? You would have to mark
the birthday
of the cell in some way,"
Kandel said,
suggesting that the train
of new neurons
offered a plausible mechanism
whereby the
brain might somehow do this.
The notion that new memories
are stored
in a train of new nerve
cells was advocated
in the 1960's by Joseph
Altman, then of
the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology.
But his proposal was not
widely accepted.
And when Rakic, an authority
on neuron
formation in the embryonic
monkey brain,
reported in 1985 that no
new neurons
were formed in the adult
monkey's brain,
this became the accepted
view.
Even when Gould and others
showed
recently that new cells
were formed in the
hippocampus, Rakic argued
that this was a
primitive area of the brain
-- even reptiles
have a hippocampus -- and
that brain
organs acquired more recently
in
evolution, like the primates'
cerebral
cortex, would not be expected
to behave
the same way.
Gould said it was this argument
that had
made her determined to look
for new cells
being formed in the cerebral
cortex,
despite the expense of doing
work on
monkeys and the risk in
"redoing an
experiment that a very well
respected
person," Rakic, had already
performed.
Rakic's office said he was
traveling
yesterday and unavailable
for comment.
If indeed the brain is constantly
renewing
the cells in its cortex,
hippocampus and
maybe other areas, the prospects
for
learning how to repair the
aged or
damaged brain begin to look
much more
hopeful.
"Degenerative diseases of
the brain are
really defined by loss of
nerve cells,"
Kandel said. Though diseases
like
Parkinson's affect specific
areas of the
brain, it might become possible
to channel
young new neurons into the
areas of
disease. "This is pie in
the sky," he said,
"but at least there is now
the possibility of
thinking about it."
William T. Greenough, a neuroscientist
at
the University of Illinois,
said the Princeton
work created a "whole new
ball game" for
addressing brain diseases,
by harnessing
the brain's own restorative
potential.
The Princeton biologists
plan to follow up
their discovery by blocking
the formation
of new neurons in monkeys'
brains and
seeing what happens. If
the new neurons
are essential for memory
and learning,
then serious deficits should
appear in the
monkeys' performance.
The researchers as yet have
no idea
whether the loss of brain
cells and the
generation of new ones are
separate
events or part of the same
cycle.
"Our discovery," Gross said,
"suggests
more questions than answers."