The Naples "arsenale"—the military shipyards
of S. Vincenzo, now a coast guard facilty. The entire area in front of the Royal Palace, plus much more, farther to the west at Santa Lucia, once comprised the Naples "arsenale".
The
Italian term "arsenale" means a weapons storehouse, as it does in
English, but, in this case, the usage is in the older sense of a "naval
shipyard"—the place where they built warships, and that is how I shall
use
the English word. The history of the
arsenal at the port goes back to 1239 when Frederick
II, the great Holy
Roman
emperor, expanded the port facilities to accommodate six galleys. Just
what he
was expanding is not clear. The capital of the kingdom was still in
Sicily at
the time, and there is not much evidence of earlier port facilities
before the
founding of the Kingdom of Naples in the 1100s. (A thousand years
earlier, the
Roman commercial port was where Piazza
Municipio now is, but Roman
military
shipbuilding took place elsewhere, just up the coast at Baia at Portus
Iulius,
the home port for the Western Imperial Fleet.) The
first large-scale attempt to create a new arsenal was in 1278 when
Charles I of
Anjou ordered a port facility that would contain 50 galleys and be able
to
outfit 6-8 at a time. The facility was in place even before the "new
castle", Maschio Angioino, but clearly was part of the same overall
expansion of the new capital of the kingdom. In the mid-1400s, shipbuilding
led to a timber
shortage, remedied by massive months-long timber fetching expeditions
to the
southern wilds of Calabria, Zervò mountain in Calabria near
Oppido
Mamertina. It was then but a short distance to the coast and the port of Gioia Taura, whence the wood was shipped to
Naples. At the time, other shipyards were opened closer to home (but nearer some trees): the yard at
Castellamare, for example. Nevertheless, ships were in such demand that
the
Aragonese (rulers of Naples from 1442 to 1500) actually bought ships
from
elsewhere in the Mediterranean. The
entire arsenal succumbed to the "scorched earth" policy of the
Aragonese when they burned the yards in 1498 rather than surrender the
facility
to the invading armies of Charles VIII of France during his short-lived
attempt
to take over southern Italy. Spanish
rebuilding of the arsenal was substantial and involved moving the
facility
slightly to the west, closer to the shelter of Mt. Echia, the cliff
overlooking
Santa Lucia; the facility then occupied Molosiglio,
now a port for
pleasure
craft and the site of a large park built on landfill. Interestingly,
this new
arsenal fell on hard times because of its inability to handle and
outfit the
larger and newer ocean-going vessels occasioned by the imperial
expansion of
Spain at the time. Naples, also, was not in the strategic position of
ports in
Spain. Commercial sea routes were also negatively affected by the
reopening of
a number of old Roman land routes on the peninsula. In the 1600s,
nevertheless,
the Naples arsenal—some of it designed by Domenico
Fontana, one of the
great
names in Italian Baroque architecture—had become a small city unto
itself, with
housing for the considerable number of workers, shops, a chapel, even
its own
local courthouse. Expansion of the arsenal under
the Bourbons (who took
over Naples in the 1730s) was impressive and directed by John Acton
(1736-1811), commander of the
Neapolitan navy and very concerned with beefing up the military might
of the
kingdom such that it would prove a worthy ally of Britain in the
struggle
against Republican France and then Bonaparte. By that time, however,
the
facility at the port was already too small to handle shipbuilding needs
for a
major sea-going navy. Indeed, shortly thereafter, in 1818, the first
ocean-going steamship in Italy (the San Ferdinando,
rechristened as Ferdinando
I) was built in Naples—not at the arsenal, however, but rather a
mile away
in the Stanislao
Filosa shipyards at the eastern end of the port. Molo
S. Vincenzo, the area directly in front of the naval college, was built
up
between 1826-51 to be a new military
port, but as a shipyard, it was already too small. Also, it couldn't
handle the
transition from sailing ships to steamships. The yards of Castellammare
could
and did, relying on the large foundry at Pietrarsa
(now a train
museum), which
made all the boilers for locomotives and steamships in the Kingdom of
Naples. At the time (1860) of the
annexation of
the Kingdom
of Naples to the rest of Italy, the arsenal still employed 1,600
workers. The
port, itself, had a state–of–the art 75–meter dry-dock, and the general
situation of the Neapolitan merchant marine and navy was not all that
bad—4/5
(!) of all tonnage in Italy was in the hands of the Kingdom of Naples,
and the
Castellammare shipyard was the largest in Italy, employing 1,800
workers. A number of things
contributed to
ultimate demise of
the arsenal. One, unification, itself, reduced the importance of the
yards;
that is, naval needs of a united Italy could be handled elsewhere
(though the
large facility at Castellammare continued to be important, and still
is). Two,
in 1873, with the fear of a war with France, a new military
port/arsenal was built
at Taranto at the extreme southern tip of Italy; the Naples arsenal was
not
felt to be defendable. Three, the rebuilding
of the Santa Lucia area of the city—that is,
the depositing
of landfill and the construction of new blocks of buildings where water
used to
be—as part of the risanamento effectively
ended the existence
of the
Naples arsenal. [I gratefully acknowledge my reliance for much of this information on L'Arsenale della Marina e l'Economia Del Regno di Napoli (secc. XV-XIX) [The Naval Arsenal and the Economy of the Kingdom of Naples (15th-19th cent.)] by Nicola Ostuni.]
back to Around Naples main page back to subject index |