|
Exploring the FutureBMGT-491 (3) |
University of Maryland
University College Electronic Distance Education Heidelberg, Germany |
| DE Term 4, 2001-2002; Dates: 1 April - 19 July 2002 | ||
|
|||||||||||
During Week 1, our discussion will focus on course mission, objectives and evaluation criteria as well as coping with technical problems raised by this distance learning method.
Article Topic Areas in GI, pages 4-5, cross-reference articles by number related to the indicated topics. Related Web sites are also shown. Web sites are further explained in GI, pages 6-7. Please make sure your read each article in GI at least once before the end of the course. These are not the articles I want you to cite in your weekly ariticle - web site posting. Find others. (You may use some of the web sites listed, however; explore them and report back to the class on what you find.)
| Week 1 (1 - 6 Apr. '02) Course Intro & Orientation | |||
|
See Week 1 Group Assignments and Week 1 Individual Assignments |
|||
|
Texts: Review Table of Contents, Introduction and Preface of your books:
|
|||
|
Turn In & Participate:
|
|
Week 2 (7 - 13 Apr. '02) The World of the Futurist ** Course Project Topic Due 13 April 2002 ** |
|||
|
So you want to be a "Futurist"? What a great ambition! But do you have the breadth of background and vision that are needed? How can you be sure? How can you develop better the experiences and assets you already have? What do you have to do? One thing
you must do this week is get started on the "Dialogues at ROSC".
Each of you will have a chance to assume the role of one of the ten characters
in the dialogue. This week, read through the dialogue and try to understand
what has happened to at least part of our country. Share your initial
reactions in the Whole Class study group area. In a few weeks we shall
review the study guide questions which are scattered throughout the dialogue.
|
|||
|
Text: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: Specifically assigned students will launch the discussions. The active participation of all students in these discussions is important. Do not miss out. We will follow this pattern often during this course. Where teams are assigned, I will appoint a team recorder. | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group Work: CG Lsn 1, Discussion Ques.: 4-6; CG Lsn 1 Activity 2 (pg 3) |
||
|
Week
3 (14 - 20 Apr. '02) Images of the Future |
|||
|
By now everyone should have textbooks and be well into the course. So how is your vision? "Better than 20/20 here and now", you say. Excellent! Absolutely 0/0 for next week, let alone next year, next decade, next century. "Normal, normal", say I. How many vision statements have you seen? Is your vision for your organization clouded by your desire and abilities more than the strengths and weaknesses of, opportunities for, and threats to the organization itself? That would not be unusual. For the ten days we look at images of the future. We are but weak mounds of clay - or the modern day equivalent - a collection of atoms (energy) as porous as anything, but densely enough packed together so that our senses can make out a shape and mass we call human (e = mc2, transporter beams, etc.). How do we get any images of the future, let alone the ones we hold? What is the basis for our "best guess" at what tomorrow will hold? As you will see, one image is not enough. Futurists are explorers - and only many possible futures and many possible images will do. But Futurists are not all alike and differences are not always handled with grace. Indeed, you will find that some futurists believe that others, who also claim to be futurists, seem bent on the destruction of mankind. Images can be deeply troubling as well as wonderfully liberating. (I have a colleague who teaches and encourages "Liberating Leadership" which itself has multiple meanings). A word of caution. We quickly get into that part of the course where deep-rooted philosophical and religious beliefs can be challenged in debate. We are not on a crusade. Nor do we mean to besmirch anyone's background, ancestors or upbringing. We are on a quest for greater knowledge and understanding - and as such I hope that all will allow us to freely question, challenge and seek reasoned explanations for each other's deeply held beliefs. I am happy to kick it off.
As humans,
we have limits. Part of growing up is recognizing those limits. Part of
being a futurist is discarding that recognition and regaining the freedom
we had as children to think the unthinkable but combining that freedom
selectively with knowledge we have gained from life experiences since
then. We must discuss freely and fairly ideas which challenge our very
sense of being - but we must do it with respect for each other's sense
of self-worth and with loving kindness. Topics:
|
|||
|
Text: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: Specifically assigned students will launch the discussions. The active participation of all students in these discussions is important. Do not miss out. We will follow this pattern often during this course. Where teams are assigned, I will appoint a team recorder. | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group Work: CG
Lsn 2, Discussion Ques.: 1-5; |
||
|
So you still want to be a "Futurist"? Well, you are going to need a few tools. This week we focus on the tools. You have several presented in the text. All have strengths and weaknesses, often related to the assumptions that underlie them. People who monitor trends have a skill for integrating the next big idea into what has come before. But coming up with that next big idea - well that is a skill all its own and often done by a specialist rather than a generalist. Futurists love to look backwards - where we have come from - to help determine where we are going. Most of us can understand how that helps for knowing about tomorrow or the day after - but not so helpful in setting out actions for next year, or next decade. Knowledgeable specialists and modern telecommunications offer us a wealth of insight when combined together using something like the Delphi technique. Many of us know how to build -and rebuild - models, both physical and mental. Combine models with a computer and other people, and we can form simulations with endless possibilities, albeit most of them falling short of the ability to predict our future with any useful detail. Scenario building and analysis offer us added tools within a defined structure. These are very useful and you are given one eight-step process that will give you a "jump-start" with this tool. Cross-impact analysis can be implemented on a spreadsheet. Take care to look beneath the CG discussion, for Figure 4.1 on pg 91 leaves you to fill in the blanks. [Each letter a.-d. in the otherwise empty cells of the matrix is waiting for us to (1) specify the actual interaction of selected dimensions and identified characteristics upon each other (2) document the "why" and "how" of the interaction, and (3) somehow weight or value the impact. As useful as this technique is, you will need to practice it to avoid over simplifying the process.] The "Futures Wheel" is presented fairly well on pg. 92 of your text; however, the final link in the upper right corner is better with 4 lines, indicating the 4th level of waterfall or trickle down effects of privatization. The number of lines connecting effects is of course critical in that it reflects your understanding of the flow of effects - it also represents an unquantified passage of time. Finally, in the techniques presented in the CG, we have environmental scanning. This is exactly the same technique described in Strategic Management classes. There are other techniques and I will pass out handouts on them to you. You should also investigate those of interest to you on the Internet. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG Lsn 4 Activity 2 (pg 73). |
||
|
Week 5 (28 Apr - 4 May '02) Human Population & Food Production |
|||
|
Pick a number - any number - yes, that's the one: 6,000,000,000. More accurately represented as six billion, the population of the world is just an estimate and a disputed one at that. But no one disputes the fact that parts of the world lack sufficient food or means to produce sustainable levels of food while other parts of the world have crop surpluses that build up and rot for fear of destroying commodity markets. We have seen "Green Revolutions" in India and genetically modified crops in the USA and sometimes violent reactions to agribusiness efforts to "improve" productive capacity of farmland. We have reactions to the overuse of pesticides, herbicides, artificial fertilizers plus a return to more "organic" methods. We have disputes about efficacy, quality of produce, effects upon the ecosystem, and even direct effects upon humans living in agricultural areas or consuming "artificially" modified organisms. I wonder what Luther Burbank or George Washington Carver would have to say about today's discussion of genetically modified organisms. But I digress. So, when will we have too many people on earth? And, how many will that be? How will you handle it? How will others handle it? Since more people typically need more resources, will the cornucopians ride to the rescue? Or will it be the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? Are you comfortable with wars over water rights, access to arable land for food production, the imposition of Oriental standards of personal space and privacy on Western cultures, spreading the wealth so that others might live - wars between the "haves" and "have nots"? Indeed, the wars you will likely see are not been rich and poor, but between the poor and poorer or between the rich and richer. Are you happy that to improve the lives of people outside your community, those inside your community must "lower" their standard of living and expectations for the future - deny themselves their dreams. We need to think about what this means for American business and culture. We start a discussion of the study guide questions for the "Dialogues at ROSC" with the questions on page B-12 and B-13. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG
Lsn 5, Discussion Ques.: 3-8; Dialogues at ROSC: pp. B-12 - B-13 |
||
|
"Apple pie and motherhood", we used to say. Don't get on the wrong side of such an issue. Today, the environment is such an issue. One would think that all right-minded people would want to save the environment. Perhaps they do - but the key issues are "how" and "how much". Take a part - any part - of our environment that you would like most to keep. No, you cannot select the "whole thing". Certainly there is one part of the environment you want to save more than others - the air, fresh water, the oceans, the forests, coastal plains, polar regions. Take your pick. Now select your method (this is a little more technical, but we can still broadly achieve this). Good. Now get support from the rest of the world for your approach - that includes money to carry out your plan. Oops - guess we forgot to prepare our case properly. Did we consider the side effects of trying to save our chosen part of the environment? Did we consider which potential supporters would loose out in the bargain? Did we consider that saving our part of the environment would be too expensive? Did we consider that 2/3 of the world's population might not care much for our priorities? Remember a few weeks ago we were talking about interaction between systems. Well, our environment represents a complex interaction and layering of many, complex systems and subsystems. Nothing is simple in the environmental debate. And while we talk, debate, deliberate, study, disagree, argue, march, campaign, and demonstrate, we continue to harvest what we have not sewn, to pollute in ways that cannot be undone, to use up our heritage so that whatever we can salvage for our children, it will inevitably be less. Are we owners of this planet or merely custodians? Is the survival of the human race a right or a privilege? Is it proper for me to use resources in the production of goods and services for my time, my community, my pleasure, and my purposes - even if that means that those resources are lost forever? Is it right for me to use global resources to improve the lives of 5% of the world's population? 10%? 15%? Would 0.05% be enough? Would I need to show that 95% of the world's people would benefit? Interesting . . .. We continue with the "Dialogues at ROSC" with discussion of the questions on page B-19 and B-20 in our WT ROSC Conference. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG Lsn 6, Discussion Ques.: 8-12; CG Lsn 6 Activities 3,4 (pg. 132) Dialogues at ROSC: pp. B-19 - B-20 |
||
|
Week 7 (11 - 17 May '02) Midterm Exam "Week" ** Journal.2 due NLT 15 May '02 ** |
|||
|
Review for the Midterm Exam. |
|||
| Text: Review prior assigned material, WebTycho conferences, and your notes. | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
None |
||
| Week 8 (1 - 8 June '02) Future Social and Institutional Resources I | |||
|
"The best of all possible worlds." Is that what we have? Not just food for the body and shelter, but activity for the mind, a community to share our lives with, security and safety for those we care about. In traveling around the world, we have had the chance to experience how others organize their societies. What we do not see is what does not exist - options not selected. Today the nation-state is the predominant model used by societies to organize themselves. If we thought about it, we could think of other ways to organize communities (consider ROSC, for example). History tells us that other ways are possible. But times have changed. Would some other way be possible today? Would some other way be better for the future? Even if the basic model does not change, what of the other coordinating structures we have set up over the decades and centuries to take care of key issues in our society - what of them? Key structures we will look at this week include education, medical and social welfare. Of course we must add to that, the family. We continue with the "Dialogues at ROSC" and a discussion of the questions on page B-26 and B-27 in our WT ROSC Conference. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG
Lsn 7, Discussion Ques.: 4-7; Dialogues at ROSC: pp. B-26 - B-27 |
||
|
Week 9 (9 - 15 June '02) Future Social and Institutional Resources II |
|||
|
How and where will we live and work in the future? When one thinks about it, more often than not we think of tomorrow in today's terms. Our dream home is the home we have been building in our mind. It has familiar rooms, familiar features, familiar surroundings. It feels comfortable. Our future lives are familiar. We can see and hear, touch and feel what we will be doing if we have thought about our lives in the future at all. Now someone is going to tell me that I have been planning for the wrong future! My dream home cannot be built - at least not where and as I had hoped. The land may not be there. The money will probably not be there. Or perhaps, it is simply that a shopping mall beat us to that perfect spot. (Have you heard of the Hollywood stars who have bought up and then bulldozed neighboring multi-million dollar properties just to get a little privacy?) Work was never like this, you may say. Will that be your seventh or 17th job change do you think? If retirement "age" is raised to 72 (social security defined age, I mean), then we will have 50-60 years of active working lives. Time enough for 15 or more different jobs. So how will you live? How will your life style change? Fuel will be very expensive, personal transport will have changed, mass transport will still be lacking, family and friends may be no closer - remember, you and I will be caught in the transition between now and then. We continue with the "Dialogues at ROSC" and a discussion of the questions on page B-36 and B-37 in our WT ROSC Conference. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Review:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG
Lsn 8, Discussion Ques.: 7, 8; Dialogues at ROSC: pp. B-36 - B-37 |
||
|
Week 10 (16 - 22 June '02) Technological Resources I ** Journal.3 due NLT 22 June 2002 ** |
|||
|
What can I say? We are taking this course on the Internet! In jumping into our virtual classroom, you have perhaps jumped over some key futurist issues concerning computers and communications. We will visit - or revisit - them in this lesson. When we bring together computing, telecommunications, networking, information processing, multimedia, mass media, education, entertainment, narrowcasting and broadcasting, we create a monster - or a genie. We have heard the arguments. Generations ago, boys played football in the park - now, they play it virtually and do not have to worry about being left out or injured. Long ago, it took months to get to distant places and then explore them. Now, it takes seconds - and we have a choice of open exploration or guided tours. Do we ever need to "be there" again? When someone asks whether we have ever seen the Mona Lisa or Taj Mahal, will virtual tours count (especially guided ones)? If we can learn from others, do we need "real life" experiences or are virtual ones enough? Will managers with 15 years of virtual leadership experience be better or worse than those with 15 years of "real world" leadership experience? Will we start requiring both? We continue with the "Dialogues at ROSC" and a discussion of the questions on page B-46 and B-47 in our WT ROSC Conference. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG
Lsn 9, Discussion Ques.: 6-8; Dialogues at ROSC: pp. B-46 - B-47 |
||
|
Week 11 (23 - 29 June '02) Technological Resources II Complete course Critique on WebTycho |
|||
|
If the 20th century belonged to the physical sciences, the 21st century surely belongs to the the natural sciences, and biotechnology in particular. Genetic engineering - perhaps a simpler way to achieve goals women and men have strieved to reach for millennia. Perhaps a paved superhighway to the end of life as we know it. But who said life forms had to be carbon-based? In the past few centuries, Western societies have "learned" that good things produced for high prices in small quantities can often be made widely available, at very low cost if we but put our minds to it. So a few hundred or thousand cars have become hundreds of millions. A few telephones in civic buildings have multiplied to billions around the world. (Etc.) So we now have the ability to clone mammals as well as bacteria, to change the color of flowers, the shape of fruit and vegetables, etc. With the proper support - we can do these things in large numbers. But the political and social implications are somehow different than those that arose when making more and better computer chips. And what about the energy that we use to power our industrial societies - and our new information societies. We have used bio-mass for millennia as well. Most agree it is time for a change. But when and to what and why and how? Bright minds have suggested that we could possibly solve some environmental problems with better lateral thinking - using simple solutions to problems from other fields and applying them with suitable modifications to tackle environmental problems. So, for example, we have found bacteria that can consume oil pollution. And there is always the wizard who turns lead into gold. But today, it is much more likely that the wizard will come up with a modern material that will help us be safer, faster, smarter, warmer, cooler, etc. The cornucopians are smirking, for it is technology to the rescue - perhaps. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
CG
Lsn 10, Discussion Ques.: 1, 6; |
||
| Week 12 (30 June - 6 July '02) Global Economy | |||
|
It is fitting in this presidential election year that we are reminded of that famous political phrase, "It's the economy, stupid!" But now our economy is global, whether we like it or not. But the pattern we have followed for the past 100, 200, 400 years need not be the one best for the future. Indeed, it may not be best for today. So in this lesson we reexamine the economic possibilities for the future, particularly on a global scale. Also, it is time to pull together the variety of threads we have covered in the course and weave a cloth, from which to cut a suit that will befit the future in which we will live. We wrap up our discussion of the "Dialogues at ROSC" in our Whole Class study group area this week too. We know more about the issues that the people in ROSC had to consider. Perhaps are judgements might not be so harsh. Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group Work: CG
Lsn 11, Discussion Ques.: 8; Dialogues at ROSC Wrap-up |
||
|
"The Buck stops here." I hope this is the message you get from this lesson, for this week we get personal. Stellar leaders are needed to take us out of the present (and past) into the future. You are a stellar leader "in waiting". All we have discussed will wither without leaders who will take up the challenge to mold the future for the good of mankind and the ecosystem we inhabit. But what type of leader do we need and for what challenges? Good question. It is a leadership task - a managerial task as well. It is a task for business and nonprofit organizations. It is a task that cannot be accomplished without people to be leaders and followers in a gigantic team effort. Uncle Sam and Mother Earth need you! Topics:
|
|||
|
Texts: Study:
|
|||
| Turn In & Participate: | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group Work: CG
Lsn 12, Discussion Ques.: 1, 4-6; |
||
|
Week 14 ( 13 - 19 July 2002) Final Exam Week. ** Journal.4 due NLT 15 July 2002 ** |
|||
|
Course Review, Wrap-up & Final comments, Course Critique, etc. |
|||
| Text: Review prior assigned material, WebTycho conferences, and your notes. | |||
Individual
Work:
|
Group
Work:
None |
||
Weekly Assignments
Week 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14Final Exam Special AssignmentsCourse Project Due:
PARTS: Topic | 1 | 2 | 3
Week 1 Group Assignment BMGT 491 Index Page Index to Phil's BMGT 491 Postings
| Phil Richardson; prichard@faculty.ed.umuc.edu | Revised 15 Feb. 2002 |